To continue reading this content, please enable JavaScript in your browser settings and refresh this page. Artificial intelligence is changing how creatives and ...

Pritchett, who teaches at Western Colorado University, notes that, for most authors, the $3,000-per-title number is likely to ...

The U.S. Copyright Office declared Wednesday that the use of artificial intelligence tools to assist in the creative process does not undermine the copyright of a ...

“The use of a machine as a tool does not negate copyright protection, but the resulting work is copyrightable only if it contains sufficient human-authored expressive elements,” the report read. The ...

The deal—the largest copyright class action settlement in history—“provides value in prompt closure,” Alsup wrote. “It avoids ...

On March 31 the Full Federal Court upheld a lower court ruling that found Australian rock band Men at Work liable for using part of a nursery rhyme in one of its songs. Grammy Award-winning group Men ...

A series of recent decisions by the Federal Court of Australia has drawn attention to the lack of copyright protection for computer generated and other forms of authorless work following the reasoning ...

The settlement works out to about $3,000 per work that Anthropic downloaded from certain pirated libraries for copyright holders represented by co-lead counsel Justin Nelson of Susman Godfrey and ...