A new rule by the EPA to no longer consider the economic cost of human health from two major air pollutants in its ...
The Environmental Protection Agency says it will stop calculating the economic savings of health benefits from air pollution ...
The benefits of environmental protection, measured in terms of advancing public health and the economy, outweigh the costs associated with implementing and enforcing environmental regulations, ...
The EPA won't consider the economic costs of harms to human health, at least for now. Legal and health experts are concerned ...
An internal email from an EPA supervisor, reported by the New York Times, stated that “to rectify this error, the EPA is no longer monetizing benefits from PM2.5 and ozone.” The agency also confirmed ...
On the morning of Jan. 10, when the federal government said it would stop prioritizing how many lives are saved by cutting ...
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency officials, including Regional Director Earthea Nance, joined a Fort Bend community panel Wednesday during a trip to the Houston area. Many residents and advocates ...
CHICAGO (WLS) -- There could be monumental changes coming to the federal agency tasked with protecting the nation's environment, including the air we breathe and water we drink. In the last 24 hours, ...
1don MSNOpinion
What air pollution does to the human body
I grew up in rural Colorado, deep in the mountains, and I can still remember the first time I visited Denver in the early ...
The Centre has notified rules for utilizing the Environmental Protection Fund, created from penalties for green law ...
The Environment Protection Act, 1986 was enacted under Article 253 of the Indian Constitution, which empowers Parliament to ...
Some results have been hidden because they may be inaccessible to you
Show inaccessible results
Feedback